{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","width":"560px","height":"140px","title":"9th Circuit Judge Argues By Reductio Ad Absurdum In His Dissent in Duncan v. Bonta VanDyke En Banc - In part B of VanDyke's Republican dissent in our series of dissents in the en banc resolution of Duncan v. Bonta (Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals, 20 March 2025), we continue covering his reductio ad absurdum form of argument.","url":"https:\/\/www.therepublicanprofessor.com\/2025\/08\/05\/9th-circuit-judge-argues-by-reductio-ad-absurdum-in-his-dissent-in-duncan-v-bonta-vandyke-en-banc\/","author_name":"The Republican Professor - Striving to seek the truth in all matters because truth is freedom.","author_url":"https:\/\/www.therepublicanprofessor.com","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.therepublicanprofessor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/REPUBLICAN-PROF-logo-3000.png","html":"<iframe width=\"560px\" height=\"140px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.therepublicanprofessor.com\/2025\/08\/05\/9th-circuit-judge-argues-by-reductio-ad-absurdum-in-his-dissent-in-duncan-v-bonta-vandyke-en-banc\/?standalonePlayer\"><\/iframe>"}