{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","width":"560px","height":"140px","title":"Sex, Gender Discrimination in the 1964 Civil Rights Act &#8212; Alito&#8217;s Bostock Dissent Cont. thru II.C - Why the Court's majority is wrong in Bostock v. Clayton County Georgia (2020)(part 9 in a series) about the faulty assumption that unexamined and unexplained transgenderism premises about sex and gender are properly included under sex discrimination.","url":"https:\/\/www.therepublicanprofessor.com\/2025\/12\/12\/sex-gender-discrimination-in-the-1964-civil-rights-act-alitos-bostock-dissent-cont-thru-ii-c\/","author_name":"The Republican Professor - Striving to seek the truth in all matters because truth is freedom.","author_url":"https:\/\/www.therepublicanprofessor.com","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.therepublicanprofessor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/REPUBLICAN-PROF-logo-3000.png","html":"<iframe width=\"560px\" height=\"140px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.therepublicanprofessor.com\/2025\/12\/12\/sex-gender-discrimination-in-the-1964-civil-rights-act-alitos-bostock-dissent-cont-thru-ii-c\/?standalonePlayer\"><\/iframe>"}