Ordinary v. Literal Statutory Construction: Brett Kavanaugh’s Dissent 2, Bostock v. Clayton Co 2020 - Part 12: We're using the slip opinion this time, see below for a link. Why the Court's majority is wrong in Bostock v. Clayton County Georgia (2020) (part 12 in a series) about the faulty assumption that unexamined and unexplained transgenderism idea

1.0rich560px140pxOrdinary v. Literal Statutory Construction: Brett Kavanaugh’s Dissent 2, Bostock v. Clayton Co 2020 - Part 12: We're using the slip opinion this time, see below for a link. Why the Court's majority is wrong in Bostock v. Clayton County Georgia (2020) (part 12 in a series) about the faulty assumption that unexamined and unexplained transgenderism ideahttps://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/2026/07/19/ordinary-v-literal-statutory-construction-brett-kavanaughs-dissent-2-bostock-v-clayton-co-2020/The Republican Professor - Striving to seek the truth in all matters because truth is freedom.https://www.therepublicanprofessor.comhttps://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/REPUBLICAN-PROF-logo-3000.png<iframe width="560px" height="140px" src="https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/2026/07/19/ordinary-v-literal-statutory-construction-brett-kavanaughs-dissent-2-bostock-v-clayton-co-2020/?standalonePlayer"></iframe>